CARRIBBEAN ADVANCED SKILLS EXAMINATIONS INTERNAL ASSESSMENT CAPE- UNIT 1- SOCIOLOGY MATTER: Prejudice Topic: The emotional and physical effect of pores and skin bleaching amongst Jamaican…...Read
Introduction to effective practice and risk management
Powerful practice concepts
This assignment will explain three successful practice rules: criminogenic want, programme sincerity and responsivity, followed using a brief case example of how it is employed in my professional practice. Criminogenic Need
The criminogenic need principle involves the essential idea of figuring out key powerful risk elements related to annoying behaviour (Chapman & Hough 1998, Winstone & Heath 2010), including unemployment or perhaps drug dependency, and then implementing prevention methods designed to counteract them (Farrington, 2002: 660). This idea is at the core of rehabilitative practice (Burnett & Roberts, 2004), if the specialist assesses the criminogenic requires and provides intervention to suit, then simply risk of even more offending should be reduced (Merrington, 2004). This need is to distinguish what is required to reduce the offending Programmes modelled on the What Works paradigm are based on the need principle. It is important to be able to separate criminogenic and non criminogenic needs, i actually. e. a person's problem that supports or contribute to offending to those more distantly related or unrelated to it. (McGuire, 1995: 15). Programmes which focus on criminogenic requirements and behaviours related to problem are more likely to be effective (Chapman & Hough, 1998: 8). This kind of underpins work on offending conduct, however addressing non-criminogenic demands may offer some profit to the arrest, but since the needs are generally not related to the likelihood of criminal actions it is not as likely to reduce recidivism (Warren & Crime and Justice Company, 2007: 31). Chui (2003: 63) cites Day and Howells (2002: 41) as also arguing that arrest rehabilitation should certainly focus on criminogenic /dynamic risk factors instead of static low criminogenic needs such as self-pride, anxiety, despression symptoms and psychological distress. On the other hand these factors can have some impact on re-offending as they may be linked, such as gaining work may eradicate depression, or re-offending. (Chui, 2003: 63) A case model is once delivering studies for the Courts. It really is imperative that criminogenic requires of an culprit is identified and tackled in the report as sentencing decisions and sentence programs will be based on this assessment. The given proposal should display on how far better to address the individual's criminogenic needs to reduce re-offending. Mr KV was a young one man who a history of acquisitive type offending. Mister KV confessed at the interview for the report that he has become using marijuana for the past 7 years; he had no money to buy cannabis and chosen to shoplift to fund his behavior. As I ought to address factors contributing straight to criminal conduct (Stanley, 2009: 154) I requested a DRR assessment and having been found suitable for a low level DRR. Following the interview with Mr KV I completed the OASYS assessment which provides clinical and actuarial ratings to inform my personal sentence pitch in the record. My pitch had to show that the treatment would effectively address his criminogenic want (Chapman & Hough, 1998: 15). My spouse and i proposed a 12 month Community Order with a six month DRR to target his substance improper use and a 12 month supervision to address his expert criminal attitudes and values. Programme honesty
This basic principle is about delivering a program as intended, (Hollin, 1995; Raynor 2002: 1186) and paying attention to whether programmes happen to be being provided as intended is an important feature of the what works paradigm. Hollin (1995: 196) reveals that honesty simply means which a programme is usually conducted in practice as meant in theory and design. Integrity places emphasis on quality, practice and analysis to see if our company is doing whatever we are attempted to do (Hollin, 1995: 203) and if we are having the desired result. Hollin's provides identified for least 3 threats to programme ethics, which is system drift in which...
References: Chapman, T. and Hough, M. (1998). Evidence base practice, London, Her Majesty's Inspectorate of Devoir, retrieved coming from: http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ERORecords/HO/421/2/P2/hmiprob/ebp.htm
Chui, W, L
Day, A., Casey, H., Ward, T., and Howells, K. (2004) Transition to higher Lives: Arrest Readiness and Rehabilitation. Devon: Willan Submitting
McGuire, T. (2001) вЂ What Works in Correctional Intervention? ', in Gary, B,. Farrington, D,. and Leschied, A (Eds. ) Offender Rehabilitation in Practice. Applying and Evaluating Effective Programmes. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons Ltd.
McGuire, T and Priestly, P. (1995) вЂReviewing " What WorksвЂќ: Past, Present and Future', in McGuire, J. (Ed. ) What Works: Minimizing Reoffending вЂ“ Guidelines coming from Research and Practice. (pg 3-34) Chichester: Wiley
Merrington, S and Stanley, T (2007) Efficiency: Who matters what? In Gelsthorpe, T, and Morgan, R. (Eds. ) Handbook of Examen. (p 428-458) Cullompton: Willan Publishing
McNeill, F. (2012) Counterblast: A Copernican correction for community sentences? The Howard Log 2012, doi: 10. 1111/j. 1468-2311. 2011. 00699. back button
PC08/2008, Countrywide rules for tiering circumstances and linked guidance, National Probation Services (NPS), 08, Probation Rounded 08/2008. London, uk NPS
Rex, S (1999) вЂDesistance via Offending: encounters of Probation'. The Howard Journal of Criminal Rights, 36 (4): 366-83.
Robinson, G and Crow, I
Rotman, E. (1990) Beyond Punishment: A new view on Rehabilitation of Criminal Offenders. New York: Greenwood Press
Peanut Butter: The Difference inside the Nutty Advertising Peanut chausser is the American desserts; it is a standard staple in many kitchens. Why is its creamy goodness…...Read